hole Fanshi data for
■ dialogue characters: Kong Fanzhi
Yesterday, the City Bureau of Cultural Relics Kong Fanzhi Liu Laogen Hall accused of vandalism on hot issues such as this reporter interview revealed that there are thousands of the city was occupied at the immovable cultural relics, including the National Palace, including the Mongolian and Tibetan schools and some of the serious problem of cultural protection units. Mongolian and Tibetan Cultural Relics Bureau to present the school has been issued within a time limit to inform the use of units, such as the November 9 yet removal of illegal structures, the request will force the removal proceedings.
[Hall] on the wing Jin
usage in line with requirements
Beijing Times: Before wen said Liu Laogen reported by Paul Hall Center in Shanxi first into the hospital wing, originally the aisle and two small courtyard location was changed to 3 “steeple building”, the current survey results?
Kong Fanzhi: Dongcheng District Culture Committee gave an answer, it (Jin-wing Hall) in the early Republic had no shrines, and it is an alley in the temple, courtyard of the building construction is generally the general residential areas, there is no feature. Take the middle of the courtyard house is cement board, now under the supervision of the district demolished.
Beijing Times: immovable cultural relics will be transformed into a private clubhouse use, is not the purpose of cultural change?
Kong Fanzhi: There is no classification of cultural relics, is the census project. Actual construction on the roadside on the original, is now being moved over, and usage is in line with cultural requirements.
Beijing Times: According to informants broke the news, Jin-wing middle of the courtyard is a pool hall, now filled it?
Kong Fanzhi: get the aisle between the two houses of the landscape pool, not swimming. Specific I need to look at with the District Culture Committee, did not see the pool filled.
Beijing Times: informants, said Jin-wing Center of the wall to open a back door, on the cultural transformation of the original is not a violation of the relics of Use?
Kong Fanzhi: artifacts can not be destroyed with the premise that style. Jin-wing Center of the houses turned down the street, no walls, an open door is the street yard, so I do not know what it where the back door open, is not a wall around themselves, and if the opening in the wall the back door, it can not be considered vandalism.
Beijing Times: Jin-wing Hall, Liu ancestral hall, dried Thai Temple, Liu Laogen Hall in the vicinity of these around the relics has been great concern, how do you see this problem?
Kong Fanzhi: this yard (referring to Jin-wing Center) actually constitute much of an impact far, the building is very much like Beijing, there are thousands of registered office, zhao House, too, is not worth building itself, and in this history and culture. The reason why this concern a few relics, I want them to go Liu Laogen use of the hall.
[school] on Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs
demolitions of the judicial process will go
Beijing Times : Beijing’s cultural protection units currently occupied, how are we?
Kong Fanzhi: Jin-wing Hall mentioned before happened in fact constitute much of an impact, (this building) has thousands of office. In particular, some palace, occupied by many institutions and companies in the inside office, rent, money, to what extent has it! Move should be to move them!
Beijing Times: These are occupied by cultural protection units, where the problems are most pronounced?
Kong Fanzhi: National Mongolian and Tibetan schools near Xidan.
Beijing Times: The nation is the Xidan World?
Kong Fanzhi: Yes. Later found to have a whole did not like, (they) would brazenly demolished, rented out, an annual seventy-eight million net profit, purely for business.
Beijing Times: Why is there the greatest impact, the most prominent problem?
Kong Fanzhi: people and businesses elsewhere is occupied, lived here to do business, has no procedures, only a business license, but after the cultural relics department permission. Crowd so dense, once a problem is not who bear responsibility, the loss can not be estimated with the people can not explain.
Beijing Times: The current reform program for Mongolian and Tibetan schools do?
Kong Fanzhi: Last month (August 9) has been served to them, “shall order rectification notice”, and start the proceedings, if the three-month period (November 9) is still here maintaining the status quo, the demolition will be forced to go the judicial process. This year we must solve this problem.
[about] cultural identification
many agencies just to make money
Beijing Times: front time, former vice president of the National Palace Museum Yang Boda several other experts will be a self-made “jade dress,” $ 2.4 billion valuation of news attention, how do you see this problem?
Kong Fanzhi: Young Alberta was introduced to by friends, not proof of identification issued by the Commission, only part of his personal behavior. If after a unit of the organization through the open letter of introduction and other identification program is organization.
Beijing Times: identification of cultural institutions everywhere now a tendency to be certified collectors and valuation, whether through cultural relics department authorized?
Kong Fanzhi: National Heritage Board of the cultural identification of bodies is not clearly defined, (the accreditation body) is just the business sector issued license, not a delegate or authorized by the heritage sector.
Beijing Times: identification of cultural relics department the authority of their own body is how it works?
Kong Fanzhi: cultural system has its own evaluation committee, after identification of a material, the process is very strict, not outside, only for police and customs issue. 5.18 There is an annual Museum Day, free to engage in appraisal activities, no proof of valuation is not just an obligation to act.
Beijing Times: It is understood that in Beijing, the identification of large and small organizations have hundreds, how do you see this identification of the market?
Kong Fanzhi: Many accreditation bodies purely to make money, purely business, with the Cultural Relics Bureau irrelevant! We are firmly opposed to this, because they qualify, are not engaged in this, is to make money, you give me the money I would give the certificate, the problem is very much implicated.
our reporter Xu Han map/CNS
to share: welcome to comment I want to comment
microblogging Recommended | hot today microblogging