Hebei Kangbao County Court judges to decide cases wrong cited provisions to apologize
Kangbao County, the Hebei People’s Court caused by the News Service letter. Tan to photo BEIJING, Zhangjiakou,
electrical (Tam ground) February 27 February 24, the CNS on Kangbao County Farmers’ migrant workers Hu Zhangui reflected “the judge to decide cases in the wrong cited provisions of the hospital that should be understanding and tolerance, “the report soon after caused by heat meetings and media attention of Internet users. February 27, the CNS reporter received the official response of the the Kangbao county People’s Court, known as “attaches great importance to the matter, and the incident to the plaintiff Hu Zhangui” apology “. The
, “the judge deciding a case wrong cited provisions cited hot
In response to these events, public opinion constantly hot. Hunan Red Net Red Hot Chili Peppers reviews published the Chen Jiapei the article “tolerant judge what went wrong is wrong again? “Said one judge, while the applicable legal error in the sentencing process, while playing time through such errors, how can we take the attitude of understanding and tolerance”? If this is not the connivance of the judge to commit low-level errors?
at the same time this sympathetic views. “The Beijing News published a review article,” the judge wrong, because what, “said signed a Law graduate marine, see this news, the author of” shock “is the avalanche of accusations by the users of the error the judge. He said that judges are human beings, work error, its own punishment for his mechanism; if the interests of the parties have been compromised, its own relief program. Error the judge, why do not we a little more tolerance then?
hospitals in: correctly treat the supervision by public opinion
February 27, 2009, the reporter received a letter from the Hebei Kangbao County People’s Court, the letter first affirmed in the reports of the new network, at the same time, in order to properly treat the supervision of public opinion, warning of the court trial, to strengthen the professional quality of education for investigators, the hospital office determined as follows:
one to enhance learning, the correct treatment media, public opinion, and as a warning, giving top priority to do a full-house investigators and police officers prone to problems in handling cases link reflection and discussion;
two weak links in the job check the rectification problems reflected by the plaintiff in the proceedings of the case, the court will instruct the relevant personnel to make an ample explanation to the plaintiff;
three, the investigators involved in respect of the event, the court will criticism and education and make a check of relevant personnel.
lawyer FOR: judge afterwards approach is consistent with the provisions of
February 27, 2009, reporters on the incident, interviewed Yang Damin lawyer of Beijing Kyoto law firm partner.
thethe Yang Taimin believe that the reference to the facts of the case combined with news reports and judgments, the Kangbao county court judge error in judgment does belong to the reference to legal provisions error.
he said, according to the Civil Procedure Law Article 140 of the relevant laws and regulations. The judgment if the parties receive text aspects of clerical error, rather than substantive rights obligations, then, the courts by ruling clerical error in the correction judgment. Kangbao County Court judge, first call the parties to the requirement to retrieve the verdict, ruling after a correction, although the date is wrong, but the legal proceedings, there is no compliance.
Yang Damin said that the court correctly written verdict should be a reflection of respect for law and the people. Therefore, it is recommended that a similar slip of the pen should cause the court leadership and attaches great importance to the judge. (End)
share: welcome to comment
microblogging Recommended | today microblogging hot (edit: SN056)
